Rushville Republican


May 28, 2013

Barada: Spending cuts don’t have to hurt

RUSHVILLE — How many of us really understand what “sequestration” means? The media has been overflowing with commentary about the good or the evil that will be caused by sequestration. It all starts with the federal budget. Technically, sequestration means “the act or process of legally confiscating somebody’s property until a debt that person owes is paid…” So, what’s going on with regard to the federal budget is withholding part of it ever year over the next 10 years until the national debt is paid, or at least reduced significantly.

In 2012, the administration’s budget request included $2.627 trillion dollars in anticipated revenues and $3.729 trillion dollars in expenditures. Obviously, the proposal was to spend $1.101 trillion dollars more than the government expected to receive in revenue, which would increase the national debt even more.

Just to help put these numbers in perspective, here’s what $3.729 trillion dollars looks like written out completely: $3,729,000,000,000. Any number that large is difficult to conceptualize until one sees all the zeros! Keep in mind that a thousand dollars looks like this: $1,000.00 – just for a visual perspective of how much money we’re talking about when we’re in the trillions of dollars!

Here’s another piece of the puzzle that’s important to understand: Despite the sequester and the allegations that the sky is falling, total federal spending will still increase from $3.5 trillion dollars in 2012 to nearly $3.8 trillion dollars this year. The Budget Control Act of 2011 forces the government to reduce federal spending by $1.2 trillion dollars over the next 10 years. That reduction package is called “sequestration.” The mandatory reduction in spending is about $109 billion dollars this year.

Another important point to keep in mind is that even with sequestration, next year’s federal budget won’t be smaller than this year’s; it means that the amount of increase next year will merely be smaller. Put another way, next year’s federal budget will be larger than this year’s, but just not quite as large as it would have been without sequestration. In effect, sequestration slows the rate of growth in government spending, but it doesn’t reduce it to an amount that’s smaller than the previous year. It’s like being told that instead of getting a dollar-an-hour raise, your raise is only going to be 98 cents, or a 2 percent reduction in the raise which, incidentally, is pretty close to the actual percentage reduction in spending that the sequestration calls for, which is approximately 2.8 percent, but it’s still a raise. So, government spending will increase, just not as much as had been requested!

Since all this was announced, the administration has been trying to make the budget cuts as painful for the American people as possible. In Chicago-style politics, White House tours were cancelled, the Blue Angels performances were scrubbed, Air Traffic Controllers were temporarily laid off, and a layoff of TSA employees at airports momentarily slowed down the boarding process – until it was realized that members of Congress would be inconvenienced by the delays! Obviously, these “money saving” moves were specifically designed to be as inconvenient for people as possible so there would be a grassroots outcry to eliminate the sequester. If it were up to the president, he would spend more and increase taxes again, rather than look for ways to reduce the deficit.

What’s so frustrating is there already is plenty of waste in government that the $109 billion, it seems to me, could easily be cut from the federal budget without inconveniencing anybody! For example, the federal government, it has been reported, owns and rents dozens and dozens of vacant buildings scattered around the country that could be disposed of. Another example is the weapons system, like Stryker vehicles, which the military doesn’t want or need, but which are being built anyway because they are in some Congressman’s district and the unneeded construction creates jobs for people who vote! We could also reduce the amount of foreign aid we send to nearly every country in the world!

“Business Insider” lists some other examples of government waste: The Conservation Research Program pays millions annually to farmers who don’t farm parts of their land. The USDA miscalculated the soil rental rate, wasting $114.5 million dollars, according to the USDA’s Inspector General. Up to $118 million could have been saved through better oversight of the Department of Labor’s Job Corps program, according to the DOL Inspector General. Because of an error in calculating performance standards, the Employment and Training Administration failed to track down $148 million in overpaid government checks. Medicare overpayments amounted to $1.2 billion last year according to the Department of Health and Human Service IG. These few examples of wasteful government spending amount to more than $1.5 billion dollars in savings that could have been realized and applied to the required $109 billion in cuts from sequestration.

The point is there are all sorts of savings that could be realized by eliminating senseless and irresponsible spending of our tax dollars by the federal government, none of which would require closing the White House to tours for the nation’s school children.

That’s -30- for this week.


Text Only
  • This column will self-destruct in 5 seconds I've become completely infatuated over the past few weeks with a gift I received a few Christmases ago. It was a completely unexpected gift from one of my big brothers: a set of "Mission: Impossible" DVDs. No, not home videos of me begging my kids to

    April 15, 2014

  • Don't sweat the small things There are a few things in life that really get under my skin, one of which is complaining. Yes, I complain sometimes, but it doesn't last too long at all before I put myself in check. There was a story this week that really touched my heart and like

    April 15, 2014

  • The timeless beauty of wicker No matter what the day may bring, I can leave it all behind when I take my evening walk. Strolling through our historic neighborhood on Indy's south side is a multifaceted treat. It is good for my heart, it erases the cares of the day and it affords

    April 15, 2014

  • Self deposit box I love where I bank. It's a branch inside of a big supermarket. I can make a modest withdrawal and then go and blow every last penny in the cookie aisle. The tellers at the window appreciate me. They know about my obsession with round numbers and und

    April 15, 2014

  • Change can be done here In previous columns I've suggested that one of the factors holding this community back is the relatively poor image many of us have of our town. The point, as some may recall, was made by several people who live in other communities who said Rushvill

    April 15, 2014

  • Second hand rose...or fashionista? "Fashion is an expression of individualism mixed with charisma"....John Fairchild 1940's sensible shoes with a '70's midi-skirt. High waist skirts with over the knee boots. Polka dot shirts with bell-bottom pants. Retro fashion is here to stay, and w

    April 11, 2014

  • Mankind is not causing global warming Back on Feb. 26 of this year, an article appeared on with the following headline, "Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans are dominant cause of warming climate." Here's what Patrick Moore, a Canadian ecologist and co-founder of

    April 8, 2014

  • One fine day True story here: a long time ago, a young woman from Cincinnati daydreams of growing up and meeting a nice man, getting married, learning to cook, having two children, etc. etc. Eventually, it all comes true for her. Except it all happens in a major

    April 8, 2014

  • It is time we take back our country What ever happened to the America of my youth? That great country that was indeed the jewel of the common person of the world. The country where one could actually, through hard work and industry, make a good living and actually have the OPPORTUNITY

    April 8, 2014

  • Net tricks My wife and I went on a binge last week. If you think I'm talking about an eating binge, you've never seen how thin we both are. If you think I mean a shopping binge, you don't know how cheap we are. And if you think it was cleaning binge, you've nev

    April 8, 2014