Rushville Republican

Columns

May 28, 2013

Barada: Spending cuts don’t have to hurt

RUSHVILLE — How many of us really understand what “sequestration” means? The media has been overflowing with commentary about the good or the evil that will be caused by sequestration. It all starts with the federal budget. Technically, sequestration means “the act or process of legally confiscating somebody’s property until a debt that person owes is paid…” So, what’s going on with regard to the federal budget is withholding part of it ever year over the next 10 years until the national debt is paid, or at least reduced significantly.

In 2012, the administration’s budget request included $2.627 trillion dollars in anticipated revenues and $3.729 trillion dollars in expenditures. Obviously, the proposal was to spend $1.101 trillion dollars more than the government expected to receive in revenue, which would increase the national debt even more.

Just to help put these numbers in perspective, here’s what $3.729 trillion dollars looks like written out completely: $3,729,000,000,000. Any number that large is difficult to conceptualize until one sees all the zeros! Keep in mind that a thousand dollars looks like this: $1,000.00 – just for a visual perspective of how much money we’re talking about when we’re in the trillions of dollars!

Here’s another piece of the puzzle that’s important to understand: Despite the sequester and the allegations that the sky is falling, total federal spending will still increase from $3.5 trillion dollars in 2012 to nearly $3.8 trillion dollars this year. The Budget Control Act of 2011 forces the government to reduce federal spending by $1.2 trillion dollars over the next 10 years. That reduction package is called “sequestration.” The mandatory reduction in spending is about $109 billion dollars this year.

Another important point to keep in mind is that even with sequestration, next year’s federal budget won’t be smaller than this year’s; it means that the amount of increase next year will merely be smaller. Put another way, next year’s federal budget will be larger than this year’s, but just not quite as large as it would have been without sequestration. In effect, sequestration slows the rate of growth in government spending, but it doesn’t reduce it to an amount that’s smaller than the previous year. It’s like being told that instead of getting a dollar-an-hour raise, your raise is only going to be 98 cents, or a 2 percent reduction in the raise which, incidentally, is pretty close to the actual percentage reduction in spending that the sequestration calls for, which is approximately 2.8 percent, but it’s still a raise. So, government spending will increase, just not as much as had been requested!

Since all this was announced, the administration has been trying to make the budget cuts as painful for the American people as possible. In Chicago-style politics, White House tours were cancelled, the Blue Angels performances were scrubbed, Air Traffic Controllers were temporarily laid off, and a layoff of TSA employees at airports momentarily slowed down the boarding process – until it was realized that members of Congress would be inconvenienced by the delays! Obviously, these “money saving” moves were specifically designed to be as inconvenient for people as possible so there would be a grassroots outcry to eliminate the sequester. If it were up to the president, he would spend more and increase taxes again, rather than look for ways to reduce the deficit.

What’s so frustrating is there already is plenty of waste in government that the $109 billion, it seems to me, could easily be cut from the federal budget without inconveniencing anybody! For example, the federal government, it has been reported, owns and rents dozens and dozens of vacant buildings scattered around the country that could be disposed of. Another example is the weapons system, like Stryker vehicles, which the military doesn’t want or need, but which are being built anyway because they are in some Congressman’s district and the unneeded construction creates jobs for people who vote! We could also reduce the amount of foreign aid we send to nearly every country in the world!

“Business Insider” lists some other examples of government waste: The Conservation Research Program pays millions annually to farmers who don’t farm parts of their land. The USDA miscalculated the soil rental rate, wasting $114.5 million dollars, according to the USDA’s Inspector General. Up to $118 million could have been saved through better oversight of the Department of Labor’s Job Corps program, according to the DOL Inspector General. Because of an error in calculating performance standards, the Employment and Training Administration failed to track down $148 million in overpaid government checks. Medicare overpayments amounted to $1.2 billion last year according to the Department of Health and Human Service IG. These few examples of wasteful government spending amount to more than $1.5 billion dollars in savings that could have been realized and applied to the required $109 billion in cuts from sequestration.

The point is there are all sorts of savings that could be realized by eliminating senseless and irresponsible spending of our tax dollars by the federal government, none of which would require closing the White House to tours for the nation’s school children.

That’s -30- for this week.

 

1
Text Only
Columns
  • There's something about Maryland My family unit has just returned from a death march – oops, make that, “vacation” – in Annapolis, Maryland. In spite of constant 96-degree temps (though it dropped as low as 95.7 at night), and the stifling humidity, we had lots of dolgurn fun. Mainl

    July 22, 2014

  • Learning to say goodbye From as far back as I can remember, saying hello has been a part of nearly each day.During my youth, it was used when I met new people my parents introduced me to and was frequently followed by a handshake. I couldn’t count the number of times I used

    July 18, 2014

  • Lessons from the largely forgotten war As we approach the official date on which the First World War started, July 28, 1914, when the first shots were fired by the Austro-Hungarians who invaded Serbia, it’s appropriate to think about the lessons that catastrophic event has taught us one h

    July 15, 2014

  • Please go away My wife is planning our summer vacation, which we will take in the fall. We took our spring vacation this summer. We got behind in 1984 and still haven’t caught up. I don’t have much input into the planning of these trips, but Mary Ellen did assign m

    July 15, 2014

  • Soothing '60's Surf Sounds I’m sitting in my home office enjoying a serenade of rhythmic pulsations emanating from the outside wall. It’s coming from our water spigot. No. 5 son (age 13) and his buddies are using it to fill water balloons. 1,500 water balloons to be exact. 1,5

    July 15, 2014

  • Soccer-stopping Storm a Lousy Treat What a great way to spend a Saturday morning in July: I’m sitting in my car with rain cascading on the roof, lightning skittering all over the sky, and thunder sockin’ it to the atmosphere with such force that I feel a rumbling in my bum.I’m staring

    July 8, 2014

  • Only in America - Top 10 As we move into the glorious months of summer, I thought you might be amused by reading the Top Ten List of what Canadians supposedly think of how things are going in this country. It’s a lot like David Letterman’s “top ten list.”Number 10: Only in A

    July 8, 2014

  • Government today is way too intrusive What ever happened to the America of my youth? That great country that was indeed the jewel of the common person of the world. The country where one could actually, through hard work and industry, make a good living and actually have the OPPORTUNITY

    July 8, 2014

  • Gone in the blink of an eye Over the holiday weekend I was able to enjoy three days, (somewhat) off work. Three day weekends are always a highlight for me and I am sure most of you will agree.I went fishing to wrap up my Sunday evening. While sitting in the old John boat castin

    July 8, 2014

  • Mum Mum If my grandmother were alive today, she would be 125, and she would still, no doubt, be walking around in her six-inch-high heels, the ones she asked to be buried in—and she’d have a Marlboro in her fingers. She demanded to be called Mum Mum because

    July 3, 2014

Featured Ads
AP Video
Judge Ponders Overturning Colo. Gay Marriage Ban Airlines Halt Travel to Israel Amid Violence NYPD Chief Calls for 'use of Force' Retraining VA Nominee McDonald Goes Before Congress Bush: Don't Worry, Sugarland Isn't Breaking Up US Official: Most Migrant Children to Be Removed Police Probing Brooklyn Bridge Flag Switch CDC Head Concerned About a Post-antibiotic Era Raw: First Lady Says `Drink Up' More Water Courts Conflicted Over Healthcare Law Holder Urges Bipartisanship on Immigration Raw: Truck, Train Crash Leads to Fireball US Airlines Cancel Israel Flights Obama Signs Workforce Training Law Crash Victims' Remains Reach Ukraine-held City Diplomatic Push Intensifies to End War in Gaza Cat Fans Lap Up Feline Film Festival Michigan Plant's Goal: Flower and Die Veteran Creates Job During High Unemployment
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Parade
Magazine

Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.